Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2006-080
Original file (2006-080.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

FINAL DECISION 
BCMR Docket No. 2006-080 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

 

 

The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that the first installment of 
his Career Status Bonus (CSB) was deposited directly into his Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) account.  
He alleged that although he submitted the proper forms, only part of his CSB installment for 
2005 was paid into his TSP account, and the tax consequences of the mistake were significant.  
The applicant submitted a copy of his CSB Election form, which shows that on November 1, 
2005, he elected to receive the CSB in three installments of $10,000 each, and that he intended to 
deposit it in his TSP account.  He also submitted a copy of a TSP Election form dated November 
1, 2005, which shows that he elected to have 100% of the bonus paid into his TSP account. 
 

The  Judge  Advocate  General  (JAG)  of  the  Coast  Guard  recommended  that  the  Board 
grant  the  applicant’s  request  because  the  record  supports  his  allegation  of  error.    The  JAG 
stated that under COMDTINST M7220.29A, the applicant was entitled to contribute 100% of his 
CSB installment into his TSP account in 2005 because he otherwise contributed only $1,833 to 
the account whereas he was allowed to contribute up to $14,000.  Although the applicant took 
the proper steps to have 100% of the bonus paid into his TSP account, the JAG stated that the 
Coast Guard erred by paying only 10% of the installment into his TSP account. 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  

Under  Articles  5.E.7.b.  and  6.G.5.a(1)  of  COMDTINST  M7220.29A,  the  applicant  was 
entitled  to  have  up  to  $14,000  of  his  pay  deposited  in  his  TSP  account  in  2005.    The  record 
shows  that  he  took  the  required  steps  to  have  his  entire  $10,000  CSB  installment  for  2005 
deposited in his TSP account.  The JAG has certified that he was eligible to do so because he 
had otherwise paid only $1,833 into the account in 2005.  However, the Coast Guard erred by 
depositing only 10% of the CSB installment, rather than 100%, into the applicant’s TSP account.  
Accordingly, relief should be granted. 

 

ORDER 

The military record of BM1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCG, shall be corrected to show 
that  100%  of  his  first  $10,000  installment  on  his  Career  Status  Bonus  in  2005  was  deposited 
directly into his Thrift Savings Plan account.   
 
 
November 21, 2006 
Date 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 Patrick Kernan 

 
 

 

 
 David Frost 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 Darren Wall 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01298

    Original file (BC-2003-01298.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    During this timeframe, DFAS informed the MPF the applicant could not receive a 2002 TSP payment since his request for a bonus to be distributed in TSP was not established until 2003. The applicant requests a CSB installment payment in the amount of $10,000 be applied retroactively to his TSP account effective 23 Oct 02, along with any interest he may have accrued. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004164

    Original file (20090004164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he is reinstated in the "High-Three" retirement system based on the erroneous allocation of his career status bonus (CSB). The applicant provides page 1 of a TSP election form, dated 29 July 2002, which shows he elected a 2 percent basic pay TSP contribution and a 75 percent contribution of his CSB. Given there may have been errors in the counseling the applicant received and the TSP contribution allocations, equity...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2008-041

    Original file (2008-041.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated September 11, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he elected to have his Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) paid to him in a lump sum. When the applicant reenlisted on June 16, 2007, he had the option under ALCOAST 304/07 issued on June 15, 2007 of having his SRB paid in a lump sum or in installments. Under the ALCOAST, the Coast Guard...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-060

    Original file (2004-060.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On August 31, 2002, he enlisted in the Coast Guard Reserve. APPLICABLE REGULATION Selected Reserve Enlisted Bonus Programs (COMDTINST 7220.1A) Paragraph 1 of Enclosure (4) states that the SELRES Prior Service Enlistment Program "provides a bonus to eligible prior service personnel who enlist in the SELRES (Selected Reserve) in ratings, billets, or units designated most critical (Level 1) or critical (Level 11). The page 7 offered by the applicant to prove that he was promised the SELRES...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-098

    Original file (2007-098.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reenlisting, the Coast Guard stated that I was ineligible for the promised bonus because I have too much time in service. 1999-027, the applicant had been promised a $2,000 Reserve enlistment bonus by her recruiter. 2005-117, the applicant was promised a $4,000 enlistment bonus by his recruiter.

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-141

    Original file (2009-141.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record indicates that the applicant served four years in the SELRES as required by his 2005 reenlistment contract, but apparently the Coast Guard refused to pay the $6,000 bonus. The 1998 SELRES bonus was an enlistment bonus and not an affiliation bonus. By refusing to pay the promised $6,000 affiliation bonus and without offering a valid reason for doing so, particularly after the applicant fulfilled his obligations under the contract, the Coast Guard committed error and injustice...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2005-092

    Original file (2005-092.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequently, a May 2002 LES explained that the applicant had been overpaid by In June 2002, the Coast Guard sent the applicant another LES showing that 15 days of accrued leave had been sold to reduce the debt she owed to the government. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On August 26, 2005, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted an advisory opinion recommending that the Board deny the applicant’s request. The applicant alleged that she did not receive payment for the leave sold.

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-207

    Original file (2007-207.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2005-117, the applicant stated that he was promised a $4000 SELRES enlistment bonus by his recruiter. Section B of the applicant’s enlistment contract incorporates the Page 7 documenting his eligibility for a $6,000 SELRES bonus. However, the applicant’s recruiter promised him the $6,000 bonus for enlisting, and the applicant has already given consideration on the contract by enlisting in the SELRES.

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2005-121

    Original file (2005-121.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated April 5, 2006, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record so that he will be entitled to receive a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) for reenlisting on his sixth active duty anniversary in May 2001 and a Zone B SRB for reenlisting on his tenth active duty anniversary in May 2005.1 The applicant alleged that he was eligible for a Zone A SRB when he extended his original...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2005-081

    Original file (2005-081.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although Applicant did have many appointments during the 18 months prior to his retirement from active duty, Applicant took approximately 42 days of leave during the period of time between May 2003 and August 2004. CGPC stated that the applicant's March 31, 2005 leave and earnings statement showed that the applicant had already sold 31 days of leave during his military career and that he sold an additional 29 days of accrued leave upon his retirement, for a total of 60 days. The applicant...